Beta— data still being verified. Please report anything odd to matt@devlin-property.co.nz

Lifetime cost calculator

Devpro vs Building Code

A Devpro home costs a little more to build. Over 30 years it pays that back many times over — in mortgage, energy, HVAC replacements, and resale. Here's the math.

The build

Mortgage

Running costs

Monthly mortgage — green-loan advantage

Building code

$4,157/mo

Devpro

$3,968/mo

Saving

$189/mo

Devpro vs Building Code — the investment case

YearIf held (savings)If sold — resale premiumIf sold — total Devpro advantage
0yr$0$76,500$76,500
5yr$24,586$97,635$145,680
10yr$52,835$124,610$228,736
20yr$154,838$202,977$478,163
30yr$253,937$330,628$785,893

If held = cumulative operational savings (mortgage interest + energy + HVAC service + replacements avoided). If sold = full net-position delta. Click any row to see the five components that make up the total advantage.

30-year "held" savings — where the money comes from

Mortgage interest (green-loan 1% off)
$67,945
Energy (70% lower, inflating)
$139,522
HVAC servicing (less run-time)
$19,932
HVAC replacements avoided
$26,539
Total 30-year savings
$253,937

The six value levers

1. Green home loan — 1% off the standard rate
Homestar-10 builds qualify for green home loan products from every major NZ bank. 1% off on a $680K 30-year loan saves roughly $68,000 in payments over the life of the mortgage, or ~$190/month.
2. 70% lower energy cost
MgSO4 SIP panels hit R3.83 (walls), R5.90 (roof), R4.61 (floor) — roughly 2× a code-minimum build. Airtightness targets 0.8 ACH50, about 5–7× tighter than standard timber framing. Real Homestar-10 operating data puts energy use at ~30% of an equivalent code-minimum home.
3. HVAC lasts much longer
ASHRAE's median service life for a residential air-to-air heat pump is 15 years. A building-code envelope leaks 5–7× more air per hour, so heat pumps run longer and cycle more often; compressors are rated for 200,000–300,000 starts, and burning through that budget faster pulls real life back to ~12 years. A Homestar-10 envelope barely touches the start-count budget — field data from the Darmstadt Kranichstein passive house has its original ventilation system running past 25 years. At today's $15,000 supply + install cost and 6%/year inflation, the second replacement a building-code home needs around year 24 costs a small fortune.
4. HVAC servicing is cheaper
Less runtime, less filter load, less wear. A Devpro home's annual service bill is typically less than half what a code-minimum home incurs.
5. Occupant health dividends
Airtight + filtered ventilation + no formaldehyde-emitting finishes = a measurably healthier indoor environment. This one is hard to dollarise in a calculator but real in outcomes — fewer respiratory problems, fewer sick days, better sleep. The health-cost saving over 30 years is plausibly larger than the energy saving; we deliberately leave it out of the calculator to keep the numbers conservative.
6. 9% resale premium on house + land
NZ Homestar-certified homes have consistently sold at a 7–11% premium to equivalent building-code stock in the same market (BRANZ + CoreLogic research). 9% is the midpoint. It's not on the house alone — it's the full house + land combined. Realised at sale.

FAQ

Why would a Devpro home save on energy compared to a building-code home?
A Devpro home targets Homestar-10 performance. MgSO4 SIP panel walls (R3.83), roof (R5.90), and floor (R4.61) massively out-insulate a building-code home (R2.0 wall / R3.3 roof typical). Airtightness targets 0.8 ACH50 — about 5–7× tighter than a standard timber-framed build. Less air leaks out → heating and cooling systems run far less → 70% lower energy bills in typical operation.
Does a Devpro home really qualify for a green home loan?
Yes. Devpro hits the Homestar-10 performance spec that every major NZ bank's green loan product recognises (ANZ, ASB, BNZ, Kiwibank all offer 0.5–1% discounts on Homestar 6+ builds). At 30 years on a ~$680K loan, a 1% rate discount saves roughly $68,000 in cash outflow and $100,000+ in total interest.
Why do building-code homes replace HVAC equipment more often?
ASHRAE's Handbook — HVAC Applications puts the median service life of a residential air-to-air heat pump at 15 years. Two factors pull that number in opposite directions for the two envelopes. A leaky NZBC-H1-minimum envelope forces the unit to run 5–7× more hours and cycle many more times per year — compressors are rated for 200,000–300,000 starts, so burning through that budget faster trims real life closer to 12 years. A Homestar-10 / Passive-House-adjacent envelope barely touches the start-count budget; the Darmstadt Kranichstein passive house is still running its original ventilation system past 25 years (Peiser et al., 2019, Energy Efficiency, Springer). Net effect: two replacements in 30 years at a building-code home, one at a Devpro. With HVAC supply-and-install cost inflating at ~6%/year, the extra replacement around year 24 lands at roughly $60,000 in today's dollars.
Is the 9% resale premium realistic?
Studies of Homestar-certified New Zealand homes (BRANZ, CoreLogic) and equivalent Passive House research overseas consistently show 7–11% resale premiums on certified-high-performance builds vs comparable building-code homes in the same market. 9% is the midpoint and applies to the house + land combined — so on a $850K property appreciating 5%/year, the premium is a substantial real-dollar amount at sale.
What happens to the calculator numbers if I change the inputs?
Everything recalculates live. Change the section price, build spec, mortgage rate, energy inflation, HVAC life, resale premium — the 5/10/20/30-year scenario table updates instantly. The model is deterministic and open: same inputs always return the same outputs, no magic.

Ready to pair a Devpro with a Northland section?